What Are Shareholders Saying?
How does blood quantum impact your life?
We asked this simple question and received more than 700 responses so far. Below are a few of the perspectives we have heard. Some of these posts you will love. Some you may not. Sealaska is sharing a variety of perspectives to help inform the discussion on this important issue. If you’d like to weigh in, please do so at this link.
"If Sealaska is going to continue, and if Native ways of life are going to continue, we must be inclusive, not exclusive. We must share our culture and ways of life with those may not be 'as Native.'"
"Being Native should not depend on degree of blood. It's a white mans measurement. We are born, practice traditions and teach our children and grandchildren Native values; it's our spirit which lives on, not blood!".
"There should be no new shareholders for any reason other than gifting and inheritance. Descendants should be able to receive stock from their relatives if those relatives chose to pass their stock along. Otherwise, the descendant should not be able to get new shares issued to them; this dilutes ownership for all other shareholders, which is not fair and should not be legal."
"I would hate to see the corporation be in non-Native control in the future. We need to do something to stop that from happening."
"Based on the existing criteria, my children do not qualify for descendant stock because our blood quantum on my grandfather's side was never recorded. In two generations, you've excluded descendants from connecting with their culture."
Previous
Next